Robco links up with $14M led by Sequoia to bring modular robotics to industrial SMBs

After years of outsourcing and offshoring manufacturing to countries with cheaper labour and bigger production ecosystems, the U.S. and Europe are on a mission to bring some of that industrial work back to its own shores. Today, a startup that believes it can help with that shift is announcing some funding. Robco, a Munich-based startup that has built a platform for designing low-cost modular robots for small and medium industrial businesses, has picked up €13 million (abut $13.8 million). The round — a Series A — is led by Sequoia, with Kindred Capital, Promus Ventures and Torsten Reil, Christian Reber, and Daniel Dines all also investing.

Roman Hölzl, the CEO of Robco who co-founded the company with Paul Maroldt and Constantin Dresel, said the plan will be to invest the funds both in expanding the capabilities of the existing modules and to continue adding on more clients to its modular-based ‘robotics as a service’ model.

Robco’s current offering is based around three components that focus on lathe turning, laser engraving and palletizing, with its business model based around clients ordering what they need made and that in turn being delivered as a service to them — the robots themselves are not purchased and stay on Robco’s balance sheet with the idea that they can be reconditioned and reused for other clients when needed. The plan is to bring on more modules in milling and quality inspection, as well is to look at further geographical expansion, for example into the U.S. market.

Even with the hundreds of millions of dollars that have been poured into a variety of industrial automation and robotics companies over recent years, Robco believes that it has found a niche in the market by focusing on tricky tasks and building cost-effective solutions to address the needs of smaller manufacturers. In short, SMBs might need to scale up productivity at times but — either due to the economics of the need, or labor shortages, or both — are unable to hire people to fill those jobs on a permanent basis. This is an area that those making larger machines for bigger industrial clients had yet to address, he said.

“When we think about the market we think there are two categories that have dominated,” Höltzl said in an interview. “The first is component manufacturers, and the other is a fragmented market of system integrators building costly and craftsman-like robots where you pay $250k per solution. No company yet has crossed the chasm to [provide] great, delightful technology that could be deployed in days or months. We are not selling robots nor software. We are basically offering an automation service, and solving a concrete problem.”

Höltzl describes the traditional approach of hiring machine operators as “the classic status quo” — something he saw first-hand in his parents’ own small factory, which was the inspiration for founding the company in 2020 — not, as you might have thought, Covid-19 and the pressure it put on in-person work, although that certainly gave it a strong current on which to generate interest and eventually sell its ideas into the market. One reason was that many factors had to lay off rather than just furlough their staff, and then when it came time to get back online, they couldn’t fill out tasks and some of their costly manufacturing machines just sat vacant, and that was before considering the weekends and evenings when staff that was there didn’t work. He cites stats that say there are around 2 million vacant labor positions in Europe, with costs for labor increasing 6.6% annually on average.

The cost comparison with using a Robco robot is big: the company today, he said, charges typically $1,000/month, with costs changing based on length of engagement (costs go down if contracts are longer), with overall charges being as high as $4,000/month depending on the complexity of what the client needs. Typical deployments start at 10 modular machines, he said.

This is taking off massively, he noted, with strong triple-digit revenue growth, “exciting unit economics,” and so far four patents on its hardware and techniques from a founding team spun out of a big research university and thus grounded in AI and engineering expertise — all details that would have attracted investors like Sequoia that have only relatively recently really doubled down on Europe with a shiny new office in London, but like others in the world of VC are facing huge pressure around existing portfolio companies and how they are weathering the significant storms that have hit the tech sector.

All of that spells more prudent, and perhaps less exuberant, investing, which likely means more strict adherence to theses around making returns and less about exploring interesting ideas.

“Robco’s approach is unique [in the SMB manufacturing space] because what they are doing is a little like Lego. They are taking a modular approach,” said Luciana Lixandru, who led the investment for Sequoia. “Whatever your use case is you tell them what machine you need and they create the right format. Implementation times are short, one or two days. Then they have created a software platform where you put the modules together creates a digital twin. Then the configuration and control is easy — something that previously would have required more technical expertise or outside consultants.”

She believes this is a big gap that has yet to be tackled in the market, with out 70% of tasks for SMB manufacturers capable of being automated. “This isn’t a surgical robot, but something that can do repetitive tasks that happen in manufacturing.” In that regard, interestingly, there is a correlation between what a company like Robco is looking to fix and what a company like UiPath (a huge investment in Lixandru’s past, and partly how she established her name in VC) focused on with robotic process automation, at the administrative end of running a business.

“This company got very far so far with very little,” she added, raising one of the other big signals investors are especially relying on these days, pointing out that Robco raised only “a couple of million dollars before this, [and] they have real customers, with a bunch of robots already deployed. We have a lot of data and evidence that it’s working. I’m skeptical of 99% of robotics [pitches] and I can see how it’s hard to build a marketplace around it, but we see the ‘why now’ here and that’s why we think it will take off.”

Robco links up with $14M led by Sequoia to bring modular robotics to industrial SMBs by Ingrid Lunden originally published on TechCrunch

LG Electronic India FY22 PAT falls 23 pc to Rs 1,175 cr

LG Electronics India’s profit after tax for FY22 declined 23.17 per cent to Rs 1,174.7 crore, according to financial data accessed by the business intelligence platform Tofler. The Foreign Exchange outflow for Import of Goods & payment for services was Rs 7,761.4 crore. The outflow on account of royalty was Rs 277.8 crore

Uber sues NYC Taxi & Limo Commission to block rate increase for drivers

Uber is suing the New York City Taxi & Limousine Commission (TLC), which last month approved a fare hike for ride-hail apps and taxi drivers amid a post-pandemic driver shortage, rising operational costs and higher inflation. The ride-hail company is attempting to prevent an increase in rates it must pay drivers in NYC by December 19.

On November 15, the TLC voted to increase the per-minute rates of ride-hail drivers by 7.42% and per-mile rates by 23.93%, a move by the commission that is meant to attract more drivers to the roads to serve increasing passenger demand. In its petition, Uber called the increases “dramatic, unprecedented and unsupported hikes,” noting that earlier fare increases have ranged from 1.46% to 5.34% and “accurately reflected the impact of inflation.”

Uber accused the TLC of using unsound economic principles to “achieve a predetermined result.” The company said the rule would force Uber to spend an additional $21 million to $23 million per month, a cost from which the company could not recover. Uber could alternatively offset the additional payments by increasing rider fares, but the company said that would result in 10% increase for riders, which would “irreparably damage Uber’s reputation, impair goodwill and risk permanent loss of business and customers.”

The ride-hail giant went on to say that the challenged rule will harm riders, drivers and the ride-share industry as a whole. Uber accused the TLC of not proposing a solution to balance these risks.

“A rate increase of this magnitude may very likely result in higher rider fares,” reads the lawsuit. “Those higher fares, in turn, will depress the number of rides requested through the Uber platform. Fewer requested rides translates into fewer opportunities for Drivers to earn fees. The Challenged Rule could very well have the effect of harming Driver earnings, undermining the purpose of these regulations.”

Uber has asked the court to issue a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction to block the implementation of the TLC’s rule pending a decision on Uber’s petition to block it entirely.

Taxi & Limousine Commissioner David Do said in a statement that the city must “stand behind our workers without traditional employment protections.”

“New York City leads the nation in protecting drivers, and this important rule reflects that reality,” Do said. “We are confident that we are well within our legal authority in implementing this important rule, and we are vigorously fighting this lawsuit.”

Uber has challenged rulings in the past that are designed to protect gig workers. A California superior court last year ruled Proposition 22 — a ballot proposal that was passed in 2020 and defines ride-hail and gig workers as independent contractors, not employees, and thus not eligible for certain labor protections — was unconstitutional and unenforceable. Uber in turn filed an appeal to invalidate AB-5, California’s controversial law on the employment status of gig workers, as unconstitutional and block its enforcement. This continual volley in the courts buys Uber time by clogging up the legal system so the company can continue to operate without making changes.

Uber sues NYC Taxi & Limo Commission to block rate increase for drivers by Rebecca Bellan originally published on TechCrunch

Twitter Blue to relaunch with actual verification process, higher price for Apple users

Twitter is officially bringing back the Twitter Blue subscription Monday, starting in five countries before rapidly expanding to others, according to Esther Crawford, director of product management at Twitter. Web sign-ups will cost $8 per month and iOS sign ups will cost $11 per month for “access to subscriber-only features, including the blue checkmark,” per a tweet from the company account.

Android users can purchase on the web and use their subscription on their phones, said Crawford. The higher cost for iOS sign ups might be a move by Twitter to offset the cost of Apple’s 30% commission for in-app purchased subscriptions, or simply to deter users from subscribing through the Apple Store at all, following a Twitter storm from an angry Elon Musk over allegations that Apple was cutting advertising on the platform.

we’re relaunching @TwitterBlue on Monday – subscribe on web for $8/month or on iOS for $11/month to get access to subscriber-only features, including the blue checkmark pic.twitter.com/DvvsLoSO50

— Twitter (@Twitter) December 10, 2022

Twitter had previously attempted to democratize the prestige of the blue checkmark — once used for verifying trustworthy and noteworthy accounts — by making it available to anyone willing to shell out $8 per month, verification be damned. The result was a slew of users buying a checkmark to impersonate other accounts and generally cause mischief. (See: Fake-pharma company Eli Lilly tweeting that insulin is now free and fake-Tesla tweeting, “Our cars do not respect school zone speed limits. Fuck them kids.”)

Crawford tweeted over the weekend that Twitter has now added a review step before applying a blue checkmark to an account in order to combat impersonation, which she says is against the Twitter Rules.

With the relaunch of Twitter’s subscription offering, the social media platform will further color-code timelines by introducing gold checkmarks for businesses and, soon, gray checkmarks for government and “multilateral accounts,” whatever those are.

“Businesses who previously had relationships with Twitter will receive goldchecks on Monday,” tweeted Crawford. “We will soon open this up to more businesses via a new process.”

Because Twitter is still really testing this feature out, the company warned that subscribers who change their handle, display name or profile photo will temporarily lose the blue checkmark until their account is reviewed again.

Subscribers will be able to edit their tweets, upload 1080p videos and have access to reader mode, alongside their blue checkmarks, the company said. They’ll also have their tweets “rocketed” to the top of replies, mentions and search and will be spammed with 50% fewer ads.

Twitter Blue to relaunch with actual verification process, higher price for Apple users by Rebecca Bellan originally published on TechCrunch

Pin It on Pinterest