Meta acquires Luxexcel, a smart eyewear company

As Meta faces antitrust scrutiny over its acquisition of VR fitness developers Within, the tech giant is making another acquisition. Meta confirmed to TechCrunch that it is purchasing Luxexcel, a smart eyewear company headquartered in the Netherlands. The terms of the deal, which was first reported in the Belgian paper De Tijd, have not been disclosed.

Founded in 2009, Luxexcel uses 3D printing to make prescription lenses for glasses. More recently, the company has focused its efforts on smart lenses, which can be printed with integrated technology like LCD displays and holographic film.

“We’re excited that the Luxexcel team has joined Meta, deepening the existing partnership between the two companies,” a Meta spokesperson told TechCrunch. It’s rumored that Meta and Luxexcel had already worked together on Project Aria, the company’s augmented reality (AR) research initiative.

In September 2021, Meta unveiled the Ray-Ban Stories, a pair of smart glasses that can take photos and videos, or make handsfree, voice-controlled calls using Meta platforms like WhatsApp and Facebook. By absorbing Luxexcel, Meta will likely leverage the company’s technology to produce prescription AR glasses, a product that has long been anticipated to come out of Meta’s billions of dollars of investment into its Reality Labs. However, report this summer stated that Meta was scaling back its plans for consumer-grade AR glasses, which were initially slated for 2024. Meta did not comment on these rumors at the time.

When building its AR and VR products, Meta’s corporate strategy has been to acquire smaller companies that are building top technology in the field. Even Meta’s flagship headset, the Quest, comes from its acquisition of Oculus in 2014. Given the FTC’s attempts to block Meta’s purchase of Within, it’s possible that the purchase of Luxexcel could spark the same scrutiny.

Meta acquires Luxexcel, a smart eyewear company by Amanda Silberling originally published on TechCrunch

What to look for in a term sheet as a first-time founder

Securing funding is a stressful endeavor, but it doesn’t have to be. We recently sat down with three VCs to figure out the best way to go about spinning up an investing network from scratch and negotiating the first term sheet.

Earlier this week, we featured the first part of that conversation with James Norman of Black Operator Ventures, Mandela Schumacher-Hodge Dixon of AllRaise, and Kevin Liu of both Techstars and Uncharted Ventures.

In part two, the investors cover more specifics about what to ask for in a term sheet and red flags you should look out for.

(Editor’s note: This interview has been edited lightly for length and clarity.)

Why should you know what’s going to be in a term sheet before you see it?

Mandela Schumacher-Hodge Dixon: Do not wait until you get a term sheet to start going back and forth. The term sheet should be a reflection of what was already verbally agreed upon, including the valuation. Don’t wait until you get that legal agreement in your inbox to begin pushing back, because it’s really annoying, and it starts to affect how they feel about you.

I’ve even seen investors pull the term sheet. No one is bulletproof, but you really want to be as bulletproof as possible in every stage of this. That requires preparation and clear communication.

James Norman: As you plan out your whole fundraising process, lean into it and start to see what the market is thinking, you want to have a bottom line in terms of what you’re willing to accept. At some point, you may need to capitulate, but be convinced about [that bottom line] and have a reasoning for it.

VCs are trying to invest in leaders, so they know there’s going to be a power dynamic here. How you manage that and move things forward [impacts] how they think you’re going to do other things like hire employees and land customers.

Which mechanism is best to use at the outset?

Norman: Once you get the term sheet, the game has really begun.

Regarding terms, you want to make sure that you’re getting an agreement that is at parity with the level you’re at with your company. You don’t want to end up with an angel investor trying to give you some Series A Preferred docs or anything of that nature.

If you have a pre-seed or seed-stage startup, 99% of time, you should be using a SAFE (a Simple Agreement for Future Equity agreement that Y Combinator devised in 2013). It’s got all the standard language that you need; no one can argue with it. [If they do], be like, “Go talk to Y Combinator about that.”

What to look for in a term sheet as a first-time founder by Connie Loizos originally published on TechCrunch

Despite myriad flaws, US remains top spot for Black startup founders seeking VC dollars

Despite, well, everything, the U.S. is still the best place in the world for Black startup founders to raise money. The check sizes are bigger, the market more mature, the ambition oversized. There are more funds, more options, more opportunities, more, more, more.

It’s quite easy to harp on the dismal funding and often discriminatory treatment that Black founders receive in the U.S. Through the haze, though, the reality is that the heart of the American Dream is still beating.

For example, Lotanna Ezeike, a serial founder, said he’s looking to fundraise for his new startup in the U.S., despite raising more than $1 million for his U.K.-based fintech, XPO.

“Across the pond in the U.K., thinking tends to be very limited, especially around the seed stage,” he said, adding that a seed in the U.K. is a pre-seed or family round in the U.S.

“I think this is because of how small the U.K. is compared to other regions, so the mind can only dream so big. It’s a spiral really — less wealth, less capital, fewer ideas that become unicorns.”

Cephas Ndubueze, who is from Germany, echoed similar sentiments. He said he still looks to the U.S. for venture funds for his startup because there are more success stories of Black founders in the U.S. than in Europe, meaning a greater chance of him finding his own path compared to Germany.

“I can definitely say the U.S. is a better environment for Black founders,” he told TechCrunch. “Why? More diverse investors in the U.S. More investors are investing in nontraditional businesses. More institutional investors are providing ticket sizes from $100,000 to $500,000 in the idea stage, more opportunities to build a founder network, and more investors that have already invested in Black founders in the past.”

While the reception of Black founders may appear warmer in the U.S., the numbers show more of the same. (France and Germany do not track race data, though founders and venture capitalists interviewed by TechCrunch revealed anecdotal evidence of persistent racism in both markets.) As an ironic result, founders look to the U.S. for networking opportunities.

Despite myriad flaws, US remains top spot for Black startup founders seeking VC dollars by Dominic-Madori Davis originally published on TechCrunch

How TechCrunch+ followed the venture dollars in 2022

When looking at how TechCrunch+ covered venture in 2022, we didn’t see a lot of positive news. We saw layoffs, demands for growth at all costs, VCs sitting on mountains of cash and low funding for minority groups — again. While some of these things may seem contradictory, that’s what VCs thrive on.

Let’s get into our top TechCrunch+ venture stories of 2022:

The power pendulum is swinging back to employers, isn’t it?

Layoffs swept through the tech industry all year long.

Natasha Mascarenhas spoke with Nolan Church, who helped lead Carta’s 2020 layoffs as its chief people officer. However, we’re going to see more layoffs in the new year. Church “estimates that another 30,000 to 40,000 tech employees around the world will be laid off in Q1 2023 — a number that follows the more than 100,000 layoffs so far in 2022, according to layoffs.fyi data,” Natasha reported.

Yeah, no, most VCs still don’t really care about your path to profitability

In 2021, startups were directed to grow at all costs. They overhired and had inefficient customer acquisition, but venture capitalists funded them. This year, we saw something a bit different. Rebecca Szkutak reports that VCs decided that using up cash in the name of growth may not have been the best plan. But did we see VCs follow through on their demands?

Move over, operators — consultants are the new nontraditional VC

Startup consulting firms are raising venture funds on their own to have a stake in companies they’ve already partnered with. It’s a little more complicated than that, but Rebecca raises the question, “Why are so many consultant-led venture capital funds launching now?” It turns out startups were asking them to.

Amid record dry powder, VCs are determined to fund anything but you

While we may have seen startup consultant firms handing out money, we didn’t see the same from traditional VCs, even though they have the money to do so. Beginning in 2020, there was a lot of talk about funding more historically unrepresented groups — but we haven’t seen VCs put their money where their mouths are. However, they are funding some people. As Rebecca puts it, “Because they aren’t backing no one — they’re just backing everyone but you.”

Black startup founders raised just $187 million in the third quarter

Dominic-Madori Davis looked into the amount of capital Black entrepreneurs raised in Q3 of 2022. To put things into perspective, Dom wrote, “Adam Neumann raised more in one round than all Black founders could in one quarter. Adele is worth $220 million. However, these numbers are not necessarily surprising. TechCrunch reported investors often retreat to their networks amid economic downturns, taking fewer risks on minorities.” Dom will be keeping tabs on this data in 2023.

How TechCrunch+ followed the venture dollars in 2022 by Miranda Halpern originally published on TechCrunch

5 of the best apps to track your reading and discover new books

As 2022 comes to a close, you may be looking for the best reads of the year that you might have missed, or you may want to start compiling a list of books you want to read in the new year. There are numerous apps out there that are designed to help you keep track of your reading and discover new books, so we compiled a list of some of the best ones to help you pick one that’s to your liking.

Some of the apps on this list are somewhat new, while others have been around for a few years. Amazon-owned Goodreads, which is arguably the most popular book-related app, isn’t included in this list because we’re focusing on newer, lesser-known platforms.

StoryGraph

Image Credits: Storygraph

StoryGraph is anAndroid and iOS app that lets you track your reading and get personalized recommendations. You can mix and match the app’s set of filters to find your next perfect read. The app offers many reading challenges, such as reading one book from every country in the world or reading one book per week across several genres. StoryGraph also includes a built-in reading journal and annual reading and page goals.

The app’s rating system is unique because it gives users a series of questions that the platform will then use when recommending a book to another user. For example, if you say that the book you read would be good for someone who likes emotional and fast-paced novels, StoryGraph may recommend that book to someone who is looking for such a read. The rating system also lets you rate using full, half or quarter stars, unlike Goodreads, which only lets you rate on a full-star system.

StoryGraph is great for people who want something kind of similar to Goodreads. The app is free-to-use, but also offers a $4.99 per month subscription plan that unlocks additional features, such as advanced stats and more personalized suggestions.

Tertulia

Tertulia is a somewhat new iPhone app that differentiates itself from other similar book discovery platforms by using machine learning to scan online discussions to see what books people are talking about. The app starts off by asking you to specify what kinds of books you want to read. You can choose to get recommendations from people you follow on Twitter, along with fiction authors, feminist voices, journalists, book critics, scientists and more. Then, the app will serve you daily recommendations tailored to your interests, which improve the more you engage with books on the app.

The app lets you browse books that are currently popular, while also helping you keep track of what you want to read. If you find a book that interests you, you can purchase it directly from the app if you live in the United States. Tertulia’s app is easy-to-use and features an intuitive browsing experience.

Tertulia is great for people who want to discover what books are currently popular across social media, podcasts and the web. The app is free-to-use and is launching on Android soon.

Basmo

Image Credits: Basmo

Basmo is an Android and iOS app that is designed to help you create a reading habit while also tracking your books. The app is mainly geared toward people who want to become a better and more efficient reader. Basmo tracks the time you spend reading and gives you an overview of your overall reading progress. You can also create a personalized reading schedule to help you easily tackle your goals one page at a time.

As you read, you can use Basmo to digitally scribble your thoughts and ideas about parts of a book that you find interesting. You can also scan and highlight your favorite passages as you read. Once you finish a book, you can track how it made you feel. For example, you can note if the book made you feel excited, happy, angry, bored or confused.

The app is great for people who don’t care about the social or community aspects of reading, and instead want to focus on their goals and progress. Basmo is free-to-use with standard features. The app also offers a $5 per month subscription that unlocks unlimited functionality and additional features.

Readerly

Image Credits: Readerly

Readerly is an Android and iOS book discovery app that helps you track your reading and find new books. Unlike every other app in this roundup, Readerly doesn’t include a 5-star rating system. Instead, the app provides context with every review that shows you how much your tastes overlap with the reviewer, books you’ve both read and topics you both enjoy. The point of this is to prevent you from possibly passing over a book that you may actually end up liking, regardless of what it’s rated on another platform.

The app also moves away from long reviews and instead has Gists, which are the app’s short review format. Gists essentially get users to write a TL;DR version of a review in 200 characters or less. Gists are then turned into an Instagram Stories-like format. Once you’ve created your Gist, you can add additional slides with your favorite quotes, characters or other additional information that you think others might find helpful. In terms of book discovery, the app will surface Gists from readers with similar reading tastes as you.

Readerly is great for people who want to try a unique book discovery platform. The app is free-to-use, and also offers a $2.99 monthly subscription fee for users who want to support the new platform and receive personalized ratings.

TBR Bookshelf

Image Credits: TBR bookshelf

TBR Bookshelf is a fairly new iOS app that is mainly catered toward #BookTok, a popular TikTok sub-community focused on popular books and literature. The app offers a simple and decluttered user interface. Like other book tracking apps, TBR Bookshelf lets you track books you’ve read, want to read and are currently reading. The app’s rating system lets you outline your favorite characters and quotes. You can also note if you reread a book or if you didn’t finish a book at all.

The app has specific rating categories for different genres that go beyond star ratings. For example, if you are rating a self-help book, you can give it separate ratings based on how inspirational and helpful it was. Or, if you’re rating a classic book, you can give it different ratings based on how heartfelt and interesting it was.

TBR Bookshelf is a good app for people who are part of #BookTok, as many of the features are geared toward these users. The app is free-to-use, but also offers a $4.99 monthly subscription that unlocks extra features, including things like seasonal ratings, book playlists and TV show and movie adaption ratings.

5 of the best apps to track your reading and discover new books by Aisha Malik originally published on TechCrunch

Netflix vs. Hulu: Which offers better value?

As streaming services continue to hike their prices, cord-cutters have found it harder to manage their growing subscription bills. Hulu was the most recent to announce a price increase, along with Disney+.

Netflix has always charged more than its competitors– January 2022 was the most recent time it raised its prices. However, now that Netflix launched a cheaper ad-supported tier, it’s possible more consumers will want to switch over to the platform.

Price increases aside, there’s a lot to love about both Hulu and Netflix. However, some subscribers may have to make the hard choice of dropping one over the other. Here are our thoughts on Netflix versus Hulu and why we think each streaming service is the best bang for your buck.

Netflix’s Original Content Library is More Robust

Netflix has been in the streaming business for 15 years, so of course, it has a substantial content library, with its original titles being the biggest driver for subscriber growth.

From hits like “Wednesday,” “Squid Game,” “Stranger Things,” “Bridgerton” and “Ozark” to big-budget films featuring various A-listers like Ryan Gosling and Chris Evans in “The Gray Man,” the entertainment options are almost endless. Netflix also has distribution rights to the majority of movie studios as well as TV programming like “Good Girls” from NBC, “Shameless” from Showtime and more.

Hulu’s original contentis nothing to sneeze at, with top titles include “The Handmaid’s Tale,” “Only Murder in the Building,” “The Dropout,” “Nine Perfect Strangers,” “Tell Me Lies” and others. While the streamer has some bingeable originals, the library isn’t nearly as deep as Netflix’s.

Image Credits: Netflix

Netflix’s binge-streaming model is another major reason subscribers enjoy the service. For most titles, the streaming service uploads an entire season of shows versus rolling one episode out per week like Hulu.

In 2022, Netflix won 26 Emmys after being nominated for 105. “Squid Game” made history as the first-ever non-English series to win the Outstanding Drama category. For comparison, Hulu only won 10 Emmys after being nominated 58 times—which was a new record of noms for the streamer.

Another way Netflix sets itself apart from Hulu is its selection of interactive series like “Bandersnatch,” “Cat Burglar,” “Trivia Quest” and the latest trivia series, “Triviaverse.”

Netflix is also expanding into cinematicfranchises, something Hulu has yet to fully accomplish. Netflix confirmed “The Gray Man” sequel and spin-off show as well as a spin-off “Stranger Things” series. The streaming giant also acquired the rights to “Glass Onion: A Knives Out Mystery” and “Knives Out 3” for a reported$450 million.

Image Credits: Netflix

Plus, the company will make reality TV history with its upcoming competition series “Squid Game: The Challenge,” which will have 456 contestants– the biggest-ever reality TV cast.

While we’re on the topic of reality TV, we’d like to add that Netflix has been missing the bar in the category. For instance, the unscripted series “Is It Cake?” received a low audience score of40% on Rotten Tomatoes. And while the dating show “Love is Blind” was a hit for the service, its show “The Ultimatum: Marry or Move On” had a Rotten Tomatoes audience score of 11%.

So, even though Netflix pumps out addicting true crime, dramas, documentaries, and stand-up comedies, the streamer has been scrutinized for its reality TV offering.

Hulu is Better for Reality TV Fans

Hulu arguably has one of the best reality TV offerings, next to Discovery+. Hulu’s “The Kardashians” and “The D’Amelio Show” have done well for the streamer, and the biggest draw is the large selection of traditional TV shows, which Netflix lacks.

Hulu’s vast TV catalog is thanks to ties toABC, FX, Fox, Food Network, Freeform, TLC, and many other content partnerships. The streaming service did take a serious blow when it lost its licensing agreements for next-day episodes of NBC and Bravo shows;Peacock now owns the exclusive rights to next-day access for those. Hulu was forced to remove on-demand episodes of shows like “Saturday Night Live” and “The Voice.” However, it still has rights to older titles such as “Law & Order SVU,” “Friday Night Lights” and “30 Rock,” among others.

Image Credits: Hulu

Plus, if you opt for Hulu Live TV, you can get a roster of 75+ live channels like Bravo, Comedy Central, E!, Freeform, Hallmark Channel, Lifetime, MTV, Disney Channel, Nickelodeon, Discovery, History, National Geographic, ESPN, CNN, Fox News, ABC News and more.

Netflix’s Ad-Supported Plan is Hulu’s Newest Competitor

Ever since Netflix launched its low-cost ad-supported plan earlier this month, Hulu and other ad-supported streaming services have faced stiffer competition.

Netflix’s new “Basic with Ads” plan costs $6.99 per month, which is a little cheaper than Hulu’s $7.99/month ad plan. Netflix also has a Standard plan for $15.50 per month, which is comparable to Hulu’s $14.99/month ad-free plan.

Netflix promises roughly 4 to 5 minutes of commercials per hour of content, and ads are only 15 to 30 seconds long. Also, new Netflix movies only get pre-roll ads, whereas older movies get mid-roll ads and pre-roll. Which is on par with Hulu.

Netflix’s cheaper plan does come with its downsides — aside from sitting through ads. Not only is there lower quality 720p video, but also viewers can only stream from one device at a time, and offline viewing isn’t available.

Hulu’s ad plan doesn’t support offline viewing either, however, it has the option to watch videos up to 1080p, with select content available in 4K. To watch Netflix content in 4K, subscribers must pay $19.99/month for the premium plan.

Also, Hulu’s ad plan lets subscribers stream with two devices at a time, whereas Netflix’s “Basic with Ads” only allows one simultaneous device.

Most notably, Netflix subscribers don’t have access to approximately 5% to 10% of Netflix’s content catalog due to licensing restrictions. The company noted that it is working on re-negotiating with studios to bring more content to the ad-supported tier.

Hulu also has licensing issues with one of its ABC shows—“Grey’s Anatomy”—so, even on the ad-free plan, the show still has ads. Hulu Live TV’s ad-free tier also shows ads with some on-demand titles.

Hulu’s Disney Bundle is a Great Value

The Disney Bundle, which combines Disney+, ESPN+ and Hulu at a discounted rate, gives your entire household a broad range of entertainment, such as on-demand movies and TV shows, sports programming and original content at a great price.

As of late 2022, the bundled plan with ESPN+, Disney+ and Hulu with ads is $14.99 per month, and the Disney bundle with ad-free Hulu, Disney+ and ESPN+ is $19.99 per month.

Hulu Has Add-On Channels

Hulu’s premium add-on channels are an optional cherry on top. Subscribers have the option to add on premium subscriptions: HBO, Showtime, Cinemax, and STARZ for additional fees ranging from $8.99 to $14.99 per month.

If you have Hulu Live TV, you can also get add-ons for as low as $4.99/month. Add-ons include Español channels, Entertainment and Sports. Hulu Live TV subscribers can also pay an additional $9.99/month to stream on an unlimited number of supported devices at the same time.

Netflix doesn’t offer add-ons.

And the Winner is…

That’s up for you to decide. If you value a large, unique content library and prefer having the option to stream every episode of your favorite show in one weekend, Netflix is your winner. If you value having access to a variety of traditional TV shows, especially reality TV programming, and bundling or including additional subscription services to your plan, then Hulu is for you.

Which one will you choose– Netflix or Hulu?

Netflix vs. Hulu: Which offers better value? by Lauren Forristal originally published on TechCrunch

5 promising fusion startups that aren’t unicorns — yet

The biggest news last week wasn’t another of Elon Musk’s Twitter tantrums, but the announcement that scientists had finally cracked one of fusion power’s biggest challenges — successfully getting more energy out of a controlled fusion reaction than they had put in.

Fusion power, which has always seemed like science fiction and just about as plausible, suddenly took a very tangible step toward reality.

That doesn’t mean that anyone is going to hook a fusion power plant up to the grid tomorrow or even in 10 years. But it does give a boost to a field that’s been brimming with confidence of late. A confluence of advances has led to a tidal wave of startups and investments. In the last year alone, investors bet $2.7 billion on fusion startups.

Many of those investments have been part of enormous rounds raising hundreds of millions of dollars in capital. No surprise — fusion power is hard tech, and it’ll take concerted research and developments over many years to bring it to fruition.

But what if you’re an investor who doesn’t have tens of millions in dry powder earmarked for fusion? Thankfully, not all fusion startups are unicorns. There are lots of new companies chasing novel ideas for power plants as well as software companies and suppliers hoping to build the supply chain for what could be a $40 trillion industry, according to Bloomberg Intelligence.

Here are five companies that we’re keeping an eye on.

5 promising fusion startups that aren’t unicorns — yet by Tim De Chant originally published on TechCrunch

Meet the cybercriminals of 2022

Arrested, seized, doxed and detained. These are just some of the ways police and prosecutors around the world took down the biggest cyber-crime operations of the year, even if it meant resorting to new and unconventional eyebrow-raising methods. From stashing billions of bitcoin under the floorboards to teenage hackers gatecrashing Fortune 500 networks, this year saw some of the most jaw-dropping breaches — and the highest-profile apprehensions.

As we close out 2022, we look back at the cybercriminals we lost this year… to the law.

Sanctions and seizures hit the crypto scene

U.S. officials scored some major wins against crypto-laundering in 2022. At the beginning of the year, the Justice Department said it had seized more than $3.6 billion worth of bitcoins allegedly stolen in the 2016 hack of crypto exchange Bitfinex, and that it had arrested a married couple suspected of laundering the money.

The couple — Ilya Lichtenstein, 34, and Heather Morgan, 31 — face up to 25 years in prison if convicted on charges of conspiring to launder money and defrauding the U.S. government.

Later in the year, the Office of Foreign Asset Control (OFAC), a watchdog within the U.S. Treasury tasked with enforcing sanctions violations, announced that it had sanctioned decentralized cryptocurrency mixing service Tornado Cash for its role in enabling billions of dollars’ worth of cryptocurrency to be laundered through its platform.

Tornado Cash, along with other mixers such as AlphaBay, allows customers to conceal the source of their crypto funds when participating in a transaction in exchange for a fee. It blends potentially identifiable or tainted cryptocurrency funds with others to obfuscate the source and destination of crypto assets. More than $1.5 billion in proceeds of crime, like ransomware and fraud, has been laundered through Tornado Cash to date, experts estimate.

U.S. doxes alleged Conti ransomware member

In August, the U.S government shared an image of a suspected Conti ransomware operator known as “Target,” the first time it has outed a major ransomware actor. The program also offered up to $10 million for information leading to the identification and location of Target, along with four other alleged Conti members known as “Tramp,” “Dandis,” “Professor” and “Reshaev.”

The State Department said Conti has carried out more than 1,000 ransomware operations targeting U.S. and international critical infrastructure. Most recently, the gang infiltrated 27 government institutions in Costa Rica and demanded a $20 million ransom.

Image Credits: State Department (handout)

Another gang dealt a devastating hit in 2022 was Netwalker, a ransomware gang that has been linked to numerous high-profile incidents including an attack on the University of California San Francisco, which paid a ransom demand of more than $1 million, and an attack targeting cyberthreat startup Cygilant. Between August 2019 and January 2021, ransomware attacks involving NetWalker pulled $46 million in ransom payments, according to cryptocurrency analysis firm Chainalysis.

In October, Sebastien Vachon-Desjardins, a 34-year-old from Quebec, was sentenced in a Florida court in October after pleading guilty to charges related to his involvement with NetWalker. Vachon-Desjardins, who worked as an IT consultant for Public Works and Government Services in Canada, was previously arrested by Canadian police in January 2021 and sentenced to seven years in prison. During a search of his home, law enforcement officials discovered and seized 719 bitcoin and $790,000 in Canadian currency.

James Zhong, the hacker who stole billions of Silk Road’s bitcoin

In a surprising yet anticlimactic conclusion to one of the government’s longest running cyber cases, the mystery of the notorious dark web drugs marketplace Silk Road’s missing billions was solved. In November, U.S. federal agents said it found $3.36 billion worth of bitcoin that had been stashed in a popcorn can under the bathroom closet floorboards in the home of the hacker nearly a decade earlier. Prosecutors brought charges against the hacker, a Georgia resident named James Zhong, whose plea agreement with the feds saw him forfeit the huge cache of cryptocurrency, along with $600,000 in cash and other precious metals.

Somewhat confusingly, Zhong is the second hacker to have ultimately turned over Silk Road’s stolen billions — albeit at a lower exchange rate than today. In 2020, a hacker who went by the alias Individual X forfeited another huge cache of Silk Road’s bitcoin that they had stolen years earlier during a hacking spree over 2012 and 2013. The Justice Department’s latest forfeiture closed the door on another billion-dollar mystery, even if the feds kept secret how the funds were stolen or how they came to find the hacker, long after Silk Road’s founder Ross Ulbricht was jailed.

The partial contents of the popcorn can, containing memory cards with billions of cryptocurrency and other precious metals. Image Credits: Justice Dept. (handout)

Raccoon Stealer operator charged over mass password theft

U.S. officials in October charged a Ukrainian national over his alleged role in the Raccoon Infostealer malware-as-a-service operation that infected millions of computers worldwide. Mark Sokolovsky, who goes by the online handle “raccoonstealer,” is accused of having a major role as a key administrator of the malware, which prosecutors says was used to steal more than 50 million unique credentials and forms of identification from victims around the world since February 2019.

Sokolovsky is charged with computer fraud, wire fraud, money laundering and identity theft and faces up to 20 years in prison if found guilty. Sokolovsky is in Amsterdam awaiting extradition to the United States.

Sokolvsky’s arrest led to an uptick in new Mars Stealer campaigns, including the mass-targeting of Ukraine in the weeks following Russia’s invasion, and a large-scale effort to infect victims by malicious ads. However, in November, a security research and hacking startup told TechCrunch that it had found a coding flaw that allows it to lock out operators of the Mars Stealer malware from their own servers and release their victims.

​​Seller of WhatsApp-hacking tech pleads guilty

Signal jammers, Wi-Fi interception tools, and WhatsApp hacking tools. These are some of the things that one Mexican businessman admitted in federal court to selling for both commercial and personal reasons. The Justice Department accused Carlos Guerrero of, among other things, arranging the sale of hacking tools to Mexican politicians, and using other equipment he sold to intercept the phone calls of a U.S. rival. It goes to show that it’s not just nation states and governments with powerful phone spying technology at their disposal.

Lapsus$ rounded up once, twice

The Lapsus$ gang rose to notoriety in 2022. The data extortion group, which first emerged a year earlier, quickly claimed a number of high-profile victims, including Okta, Microsoft, Nvidia and Samsung.

While the gang once seemed invincible, a number of its members were arrested in March this year. In a statement given to TechCrunch at the time, City of London Police confirmed that seven people between the ages of 16 and 21 had been arrested in connection with Lapsus$.

News of the arrests came just hours after a Bloomberg report revealed a teenager based in Oxfordshire, U.K. is suspected of being the mastermind of the Lapsus$ group. Researchers investigating the gang’s recent hacks said they believed the 16-year-old, who uses the online moniker “White” or “Breachbase,” was a leading figure in Lapsus$, and Bloomberg was able to track down the suspected hacker after his personal information was published online by rival hackers. Weeks later, U.K. police said they had charged two of the teenagers with multiple cyber offenses.

SSNDOB, a marketplace for stolen Social Security numbers, is no more

U.S. officials in June announced the takedown of SSNDOB, a notorious marketplace used for trading the personal information — including Social Security numbers, or SSNs — of millions of Americans.

The landmark operation was carried out by the FBI, IRS and the DOJ, with help from the Cyprus Police, and saw authorities seize four domains hosting the SSNDOB marketplace.

SSNDOB listed the personal information for approximately 24 million individuals in the United States, including names, dates of birth, SSNs and credit card numbers and generated more than $19 million in revenue, according to prosecutors. Chainalysis reported separately that the marketplace has received nearly $22 million worth of bitcoin across over 100,000 transactions since April 2015, though the marketplace is believed to have been active for several years prior to its eventual seizure.

The FBI’s seizure notice on SSNDOB, shortly after the site was taken down by federal authorities. Image Credits: TechCrunch (screenshot)

Ex-Amazon engineer convicted of Capital One data heist

Also in June, Paige Thompson, a former engineer in Amazon’s cloud division, was convicted of a breach that compromised the personal and financial information of 100 million CapitalOne customers in 2019. The breach was one of the biggest bank heists in U.S. history, which included the theft of credit scores, limits and balances, and also affected a million Canadians. Thompson was accused of using her knowledge as an Amazon software engineer to breach CapitalOne’s online cloud storage, hosted on Amazon’s servers, and compromising the cloud storage of several other companies, including Vodafone, Ford, and Ohio’s state motor vehicle agency. Prosecutors said the former Amazon engineer was “one bad day away from sharing the data she stole.” As such, Thompson was sentenced to time served, allowing her to avoid prison.

A major REvil operator was extradited to the United States

With a $10 million bounty on their heads after a brazen ransomware attack on Kaseya that spread to hundreds of its downstream customers, it was only a matter of time before the REvil ransomware group’s luck would run out. That’s what happened with Yaroslav Vasinskyi, a 22-year-old Ukrainian national, who was arrested in Poland in October and later arraigned and extradited to Dallas, Texas to face accusations of computer hacking and fraud by way of his alleged involvement with REvil. Vasinskyi is one of two other alleged REvil members charged by U.S. prosecutors in relation to the attack on Kaseya. It was only after the FBI recovered the decryption key that victims were able to gain access back to their encrypted files.

U.K. arrest teenagers linked to Uber and GTA hacks

In September, police in London confirmed that a 17-year-old teenager suspected of involvement in high-profile breaches at ride-hailing giant Uber and Rockstar Games had been charged with multiple counts of computer misuse and breaches of bail.

These hacks were two of the most high-profile of 2022. Uber, which said it believed a hacker affiliated with Lapsus$ was responsible for the attack, was forced to take several of its internal tools offline while it expelled the hacker from its network. Shortly before Uber’s Slack system was taken offline, Uber employees received a message that read, “I announce I am a hacker and Uber has suffered a data breach.” The hacker also reportedly said that Uber drivers should receive higher pay.

In the case of Rockstar Games, the attacker — who also goes by the alias “TeaPot” — claimed to have gained access to Rockstar Games’ internal messages on Slack and early code for an unannounced Grand Theft Auto sequel by gaining access to an employee’s login credentials.

Meet the cybercriminals of 2022 by Zack Whittaker originally published on TechCrunch

2022’s best and worst dinner guests: Elon Musk and SBF

What. A. Year.

Hello and welcome back toEquity, a podcast about the business of startups, where we unpack the numbers and nuance behind the headlines.

In honor of 2022 finally coming to a close, the Equity crew is getting reflective. We dug through the archives, and this week, we’re listening back to Alex, Natasha and Mary Ann’s coverage of the biggest stories of the year as they unfolded.

Here’s what the trio got into with help from guest hosts, Becca Szkutak and Anita Ramaswamy:

How Alex jinxed us from the start when he asked for more tech drama (TC+)
Early signs of the downturn to come with Better.com and the human cost of layoffs
The will-they-won’t-they courtship of Elon Musk and Twitter
The downfall of FTX (TC+) and why you should never let FOMO guide your investments (TC+)

Some of these stories are still evolving as we type, but don’t fret – we’ll catch you up in the new year.

Of course, we can’t sign off without saying thank you to all of you for sticking by us during this rollercoaster of a year, and we can’t wait to see you in 2023!

Equity drops at 7 a.m. PT every Monday, Wednesday and Friday, so subscribe to us on Apple Podcasts, Overcast,Spotify and all the casts. TechCrunch also has a great show on crypto, a show that interviews founders, one that details how our stories come together, and more!

2022’s best and worst dinner guests: Elon Musk and SBF by Theresa Loconsolo originally published on TechCrunch

5 tips for dealing with Day 2 Kubernetes operational challenges

Kubernetes is a wonderful but complex software that can present significant “Day Two” challenges when put into production.

Developers who are new to Kubernetes — and most are — face a large knowledge gap when they look to sustain and optimize Kubernetes clusters.

In this piece, I will share several ways to address problems as they arise.

Optimize your Kubernetes cluster for cost

As adoption of Kubernetes rises, the need for applications and engineers to access clusters is also growing. However, it is neither feasible nor cost-efficient to always use entire physical clusters to achieve this goal.

Virtual clusters are a great way to reduce costs. In a scenario of 100 developers, we calculated up to 78% savings by using open source virtual clusters.

Leveraging virtual clusters with open source software such as VirtualCluster or vcluster lets Kubernetes operators can run multiple virtual clusters within a single physical cluster, thereby increasing the tenancy of each. By utilizing computing resources via this more communal method, organizations can save on computing costs as opposed to operating entirely separate Kubernetes clusters.

Increase tenant isolation

By leveraging policy engines, it’s possible to implement software security guardrails on your cloud-native Kubernetes infrastructure.

Another great benefit of virtual clusters is that they are isolated from other users on the cluster. This gives each user their own workspace that looks and feels exactly like a physical Kubernetes cluster.

In addition, virtual clusters enable a stricter form of multitenancy compared to namespace-based multitenancy. One of the main concerns with namespace-based multitenancy is that it cannot contain cluster-scoped resources. Many applications must create, or at least access, cluster-scoped resources like nodes, cluster roles, persistent volumes and storage classes.

Virtual clusters also provide security benefits by increasing the isolation in multitenancy clusters via:

Full control-plane isolation.
Domain Name System (DNS) isolation.
Resources created on a single namespace.

Organizations seeking a solution for multitenant applications that provide greater isolation for resources shared among their clusters should consider virtual clusters as an option. On top of saving costs and being simpler to deploy, they are also easier to manage than physical clusters.

Provide integrated development environments

5 tips for dealing with Day 2 Kubernetes operational challenges by Ram Iyer originally published on TechCrunch

Pin It on Pinterest