Categories: Tech NewsTechCrunch+

Debunking the myths of why venture investors don’t fund diverse startups

People can never land on a word to explain what is happening to women and minorities within venture. Are such founders overlooked or undersought? Underestimated and underrepresented? Marginalized? Discriminated against? Or just ignored?

The excuses used to justify these sobriquets are equally scattered. Women received just 1.9% of all venture capital funds last year because they are only building beauty and wellness companies; there is a lack of a proven track record; it’s too early, they are too risky, and there is a pipeline problem. Maybe she’ll get married, have a family, and leave the business behind.

And Black founders raised 1% of venture funds because there aren’t enough of them pitching; they are a minority of the population and thus deserve a minority of the funds; their products and markets tap into something only their community can relate toward; there isn’t enough traction, they aren’t qualified; or, as one Twitter user wrote, they aren’t “male, pale and from Yale.”

Advertisement

Ah, yes, this explains it all. Women are too emotional to run companies. One female founder told TechCrunch she heard an investor say he wouldn’t invest in a women-founded company because “she was annoying.”

Men, on the other hand, are not annoying. They are competent and qualified, and, as we all well know, sexism and racial discrimination went poof after the civil rights and third-wave feminism movements. Since then, decisions toward people of color and women have been based purely on quantitative and provable facts. Obviously.

“You can’t say you support women in tech without supporting moms.” Suelin Chen, founder

Advertisement

Indeed, investors’ fact-based due diligence often leaves out that women-founded companies have higher returns than male-founded ones. The rest of the data regarding bias in the venture industry is so nebulous that it’s hard to call much of it out. Without transparency, it’s difficult to determine exactly how many people of color and women are pitching, thus making it hard to assess how disproportionate funding to these groups truly is. There is a way, though, to pick apart some common misconceptions.

For one, women (especially Black women) are more likely to start a business than men (and continue to open companies in increasing amounts), meaning the idea that there aren’t enough women to invest in is simply untrue.

Debunking the myths of why venture investors don’t fund diverse startups by Dominic-Madori Davis originally published on TechCrunch

Advertisement
Share
Published by

Recent Posts

Securing phpMyAdmin Like a Pro: Essential Tips and Tricks

Securing phpMyAdmin is crucial to prevent unauthorized access and protect your databases. Here's a guide…

5 months ago

Pasqal raises $100M to build a neutral atom-based quantum computer

Pasqal, a Paris-based quantum computing startup, today announced that it has raised a $100 million…

1 year ago

Apple in talks with Disney, others on VR content for new headset: Report

Developed with Sony Group Corp, the headset will have two ultra-high-resolution displays to handle the…

1 year ago

Microsoft, Amazon results to highlight softening cloud business

After years of blistering growth, most recently fuelled by remote working and studying during the…

1 year ago

Intel chairman Omar Ishrak steps down

Omar Ishrak had stepped down and the chipmaker appointed board director Frank Yeary as his…

1 year ago

Canada to commercialise world's first photonic-based quantum computer

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has announced a new federal investment to build and commercialise…

1 year ago